Evidence aligned with the capabilities NEOMA values
Connect AI-supported work to a consistent record of how students question information, apply concepts and defend their own position.
Responsible AI · critical judgement · assessment evidence
Make what every NEOMA student can question, judge and defend visible at scale
NEOMA is already rethinking assessment around what AI cannot supply: a personal viewpoint, defensible reasoning and genuine judgement. Integrevise could add structured evidence of those capabilities through short adaptive discussions grounded in existing student work, without turning live faculty interviews into the constraint.
One practical evidence layer
Support authentic assessment without adding a live viva to every submission.
Integrevise works from materials teaching teams already use. It creates a structured opportunity for explanation while academic judgement remains with the institution.
Review reasoning without interviewing every student live
Receive structured evidence of explanation, judgement and application while retaining control of the final academic decision.
Show the thinking behind a polished submission
Give every student a transparent opportunity to explain their process, respond to challenge and receive personalised feedback.
potential reduction in verification workload>90%One university setting
Preliminary university evidence
A practical route to stronger evidence without scaling live interview time.
A peer-reviewed, multi-cycle study in one US university setting estimated a potential reduction of more than 90% in verification workload. The findings are preliminary, but they indicate how short post-submission discussions could make verification more scalable while faculty retain judgement.
Read the peer-reviewed studyNEOMA’s published direction
When AI can polish the output, assessment needs to reveal the judgement behind it
NEOMA’s 2026 AI Day identified the risk that students can submit strong work without having thought through or understood it. Its response centres assessment on personal perspective, critical validation, defensible reasoning and real judgement.
Integrevise could add reviewable evidence of those capabilities through a short adaptive discussion grounded in the existing brief, submission and criteria, complementing NEOMA’s assessment model rather than replacing it.
These official sources establish context; they do not imply that the institution has endorsed Integrevise.NEOMA sets the expectationStudents should be able to doubt, analyse, validate and defend a position when challenged.
Integrevise addsReviewable evidence through student explanation.
A focused first conversation
Compare priorities before designing anything.
A 20-minute conversation can compare NEOMA’s current assessment priorities with the evidence layer Integrevise could add. No module selection or assessment redesign is required beforehand.
Book a 20-minute conversation No module selection or assessment redesign required.