Scale the rigorous assessment IÉSEG is calling for
Connect concrete, frequent assessment with consistent evidence of the reasoning and application each student can demonstrate across programmes.
Responsible AI · rigorous assessment · visible reasoning
Make rigorous assessment scalable as IÉSEG moves beyond policing AI
IÉSEG has framed the assessment question clearly: not how to fight AI use, but how to know whether students have genuinely acquired and can apply what they know. Integrevise could add a practical evidence layer through short adaptive discussions grounded in existing work, making reasoning visible without multiplying live interviews.
One practical evidence layer
Support authentic assessment without adding a live viva to every submission.
Integrevise works from materials teaching teams already use. It creates a structured opportunity for explanation while academic judgement remains with the institution.
See student reasoning without scaling interview time
Receive structured evidence of explanation, judgement and application while retaining control of the academic decision.
Show what has genuinely been learned
Give every student a transparent opportunity to explain their choices, apply knowledge and receive personalised feedback after submission.
potential reduction in verification workload>90%One university setting
Preliminary university evidence
A practical route to stronger evidence without scaling live interview time.
A peer-reviewed, multi-cycle study in one US university setting estimated a potential reduction of more than 90% in verification workload. The findings are preliminary, but they indicate how short post-submission discussions could make verification more scalable while faculty retain judgement.
Read the peer-reviewed studyIÉSEG’s published direction
Assessment should reveal what students have genuinely acquired and can apply
IÉSEG’s Director of Pedagogy describes assessment as the critical AI-era issue and calls for continuous evidence of reasoning, while recognising that richer assessment is more time-consuming. The School’s AI Day and CETI are already helping faculty turn that direction into practical teaching and assessment innovation.
Integrevise could add reviewable evidence of what each student understands through a short adaptive discussion grounded in the existing brief, submission, criteria and learning outcomes, complementing IÉSEG’s assessment model rather than replacing it.
These official sources establish context; they do not imply that the institution has endorsed Integrevise.IÉSEG sets the expectationMove beyond fighting cheating towards concrete, frequent and rigorous assessment of student reasoning, application and progress.
Integrevise addsReviewable evidence through student explanation.
A focused first conversation
Compare priorities before designing anything.
A 20-minute conversation can compare IÉSEG’s assessment priorities with the evidence layer Integrevise could add. No module selection or assessment redesign is required beforehand.
Book a 20-minute conversation No module selection or assessment redesign required.