Protect confidence in flexible online awards.
Add direct evidence of how part-time, employed and apprentice learners connect academic knowledge with built-environment practice.
Integrevise for the University of the Built Environment
UBE is strengthening authentic, industry-relevant assessment across a wholly online university. Integrevise adds a five-to-ten-minute adaptive discussion grounded in each submission, brief, rubric and learning outcomes, creating reviewable evidence of understanding without AI detection or a live discussion for every student.
One practical evidence layer
Integrevise works from materials teaching teams already use. It creates a structured opportunity for explanation while academic judgment remains with the university.
Add direct evidence of how part-time, employed and apprentice learners connect academic knowledge with built-environment practice.
Use existing briefs and rubrics to focus attention on the submissions that need closer academic review while judgement remains with UBE.
Give learners a fair opportunity to explain professional choices, reflect on feedback and demonstrate understanding in their own words.
Early evidence, clearly bounded
A published, multi-cycle study at one private US liberal-arts college offers preliminary qualitative evidence that post-submission oral verification can surface comprehension gaps and implementation issues. It does not establish broad efficacy or scalability.
Read the peer-reviewed studyAuthentic assessment in supported online learning
UBE’s July 2025 Degree Outcomes Statement describes coursework, portfolios, practical and project assessment; an Assessment Steering Group supporting authentic programme-level design; and greater use of presentations, posters and short-answer questions. It also identifies generative AI as an assessment challenge being addressed through authentic learning and a clear AI policy.
Integrevise complements that direction with a consistent record of what a student can explain after submission. It keeps UBE’s marking, moderation and support processes intact while making reasoning easier for academic teams to review.
These official sources establish context; they do not imply that the university has endorsed Integrevise.A focused first conversation
Discuss authentic assessment, academic workload and how direct student explanation could complement UBE’s existing quality processes.
Book a 20-minute conversation No module selection or assessment redesign required.