Protect confidence in outcomes
Connect rigorous submitted work to direct evidence of individual understanding.
Perspective prepared by
Proof of understanding at Harvard
Keep rigorous assessment. Know what each student understands.
Integrevise adds a short oral check to existing assignments, giving Harvard faculty clearer evidence of what each student understands without redesigning courses or multiplying faculty interviews.
See the value ↓Works from the existing brief, rubric and student submission.
FROM SUBMISSION TO PROOF ONE SIMPLE ADDITION
EXISTINGAssessmentBrief + rubric + submission
ADDShort adaptive oralGrounded in the student's work
THE RESULTReliable evidence of understanding
What the student can explain, justify and defend.
Existing assessment retained · Academic judgement retained
REASSURANCEBuilt for credible academic use
Peer-reviewedPublished in 2026
University evaluatedTested in a live pilot
Russell Group testedWith academics and students
Human judgementFaculty retain control
01
The value
Stronger evidence for Harvard, faculty and students.
The opportunity is to preserve rigorous written work while giving every stakeholder clearer evidence, more focused attention and more useful feedback.
Focus attention where needed
Review structured evidence and priority concerns without conducting every conversation.
Receive feedback that develops learning
See what was demonstrated well and where deeper reasoning would strengthen future work.
HARVARD CONTEXTWhy stronger evidence matters now
85% use Gen AI at least biweekly
50%+ use it for writing assignments
Detection produces false positives and false negatives
Harvard Bok Center guidanceTHE SHIFTFROM POLICY TO PROOF
01 · EXPECTATIONSCourse AI policy
Clarifies what students may do.
02 · EVIDENCEUnderstanding check
Shows what the student can explain, justify and defend.
Clearer academic decisions More useful student feedback
03
The alignmentHarvard is moving beyond AI rules towards better assessment evidence.
Harvard College's 2026 Student Generative AI Summit prioritised assessment design over more course policies. Integrevise turns that direction into practical proof of understanding, helping faculty make clearer decisions while giving students feedback they can use.
Policy sets expectations. Verification makes learning visible.
Harvard College account 03
The operational opportunity
Stronger evidence without another faculty workload problem.
Keep the existing design
Use the assignment brief, rubric, learning outcomes and submission already in place.
Add a short oral check
Run a consistent adaptive discussion grounded in the student's own work.
Focus academic review
Surface the strongest evidence and priority concerns for faculty consideration.
04
A practical fitA small addition to the workflow. A stronger basis for judgement.
Integrevise works from the assessment already in place. There is no need to rebuild the course, replace the academic standard or automate the final decision.
No wholesale redesign
Start with the current brief, rubric, learning outcomes and submission.
Consistent at scale
Give every selected student a short oral grounded in the same academic standard.
Clearer faculty evidence
Create a structured record of what the student can explain and defend.
Focused attention
Surface priority concerns so faculty review only where judgement is needed.
VALUE FOR THE STUDENTPersonalised feedback helps students reflect, improve and prepare for future work.
05
04 / The offer
Start with one assessment. Build the evidence to expand.
Select a meaningful use case
Choose one assessment, course or cohort where clearer evidence would add immediate value.
Use the existing assessment
Work from the current brief, rubric, learning outcomes and student submission.
Measure institutional value
Evaluate evidence quality, faculty usability and student experience.
Expand with confidence
Use the results to decide where proof of understanding should support more assessments.
PEER-REVIEWED2026UNIVERSITY SETTING
02 / The validation
Already evaluated in a university setting.
Integrevise's adaptive oral approach has been evaluated through a university pilot and published in Trends in Higher Education. Students reported 69% positive feedback and average confidence of 7.8 out of 10, while faculty-led academic judgement remained central.
Short adaptive conversationsStructured evidenceFaculty-led decisions
Read the peer-reviewed paper A focused next step
Where could Harvard benefit from clearer evidence first?
A 20-minute conversation to compare approaches and identify one assessment where oral verification could add immediate value.
Book a 20-minute conversation →
No preparation required · With Kyle Poyer, CEO and Co-Founder of Integrevise