Connect teaching innovation with clearer evidence of learning
Add evidence of what students can explain to the work they submit, while retaining academic standards and institutional judgement.
Clearer understanding · timely feedback · academic ownership
Turn evidence of understanding into feedback students can use
Cornell’s teaching guidance connects assessment with learning outcomes and timely feedback. Give faculty a clearer view of students’ reasoning, so they can spot gaps earlier and focus support without adding a live conversation to every submission.
One practical evidence layer
Support authentic assessment without adding a live viva to every submission.
Integrevise works from materials teaching teams already use. It creates a structured opportunity for explanation while academic judgement remains with the institution.
Spend less time checking and more time helping
See gaps in reasoning sooner and focus feedback where students need it most, without conducting every conversation yourself.
Understand the gap. Know what to do next.
Give students an opportunity to explain their thinking and receive personalised feedback they can use to strengthen their understanding.
Peer-reviewed university study2026One university setting
Early evidence, clearly bounded
A practical approach with preliminary university evidence.
A published, multi-cycle study at one private US liberal-arts college offers preliminary qualitative evidence that post-submission oral verification can surface comprehension gaps and implementation issues. It does not establish broad efficacy or scalability.
Read the peer-reviewed studyCornell’s published direction
Connect teaching innovation with clearer evidence of learning
Cornell’s Center for Teaching Innovation supports formative and summative assessment, feedback and manageable grading. Its guidance on measuring learning asks instructors to align assessment with learning outcomes and consider the time and resources required.
Integrevise could help Cornell connect that direction with evidence of individual understanding. AI-guided conversations can give faculty clearer insight and students useful feedback, while academic decisions remain with the institution. This is a proposed application, not an existing partnership.
These official sources establish context; they do not imply that the institution has endorsed Integrevise.Cornell sets the directionAssessment should make learning visible and remain sustainable for students and instructors.
Integrevise addsReviewable evidence through student explanation.
A focused first conversation
See where this could help.
A short conversation about Cornell’s priorities for student understanding, feedback and faculty workload.
Book a 20-minute conversation No module selection or assessment redesign required.