Put published AI principles into assessment practice
Add consistent evidence of explanation and ownership to a university-wide AI strategy spanning teaching, research and professional preparation.
Campus-wide ChatGPT Edu · transparent use · accountable thinking
Make accountable AI use visible across Bocconi
Bocconi expects AI use to be visible, explainable and documented, with students able to justify how results were produced. Integrevise could turn that principle into reviewable evidence through short adaptive discussions grounded in existing work, giving faculty clearer sight of individual understanding without interviewing every student live.
One practical evidence layer
Support authentic assessment without adding a live viva to every submission.
Integrevise works from materials teaching teams already use. It creates a structured opportunity for explanation while academic judgement remains with the institution.
See who can justify the work without interviewing everyone
Review structured evidence of reasoning, choices and application while retaining control of every academic decision.
Stand behind the thinking, not only the output
Give each student a transparent opportunity to explain AI use, defend their choices and receive personalised feedback after submission.
potential reduction in verification workload>90%One university setting
Preliminary university evidence
A practical route to stronger evidence without scaling live interview time.
A peer-reviewed, multi-cycle study in one US university setting estimated a potential reduction of more than 90% in verification workload. The findings are preliminary, but they indicate how short post-submission discussions could make verification more scalable while faculty retain judgement.
Read the peer-reviewed studyBocconi’s published direction
Bocconi asks people to explain AI use and stand behind the work
Bocconi’s AI strategy combines campus-wide ChatGPT Edu access with human-centred principles of transparency, responsibility and accountability. Its undergraduate teaching model already values interaction through group projects, simulations and case analysis, while the Rectorate assigns clear leadership for AI and digital teaching.
Integrevise could add reviewable evidence of what each student understands through a short adaptive discussion grounded in the existing brief, submission, criteria and learning outcomes. It complements Bocconi’s assessment model and AI principles rather than replacing either academic judgement or existing teaching practice.
These official sources establish context; they do not imply that the institution has endorsed Integrevise.Bocconi sets the expectationAI use should be disclosed and explainable, with people able to justify how results were produced and take ownership of their reasoning.
Integrevise addsReviewable evidence through student explanation.
A focused first conversation
Compare priorities before designing anything.
A 20-minute conversation can compare Bocconi’s AI and assessment priorities with the evidence layer Integrevise could add. No module selection or assessment redesign is required beforehand.
Book a 20-minute conversation No module selection or assessment redesign required.